El dilema de Margot:

la salida es por la puerta trasera

Tania Tovar Torres

Resumen

¿Qué pasa cuando un edificio deja de existir? ¿Qué pasa cuando la realidad sobre un edificio o una obra de arte se convierte en objeto de reconstrucción? Este ensayo argumenta la posibilidad de que la arquitectura ya no sobreviva como objeto –edificio– sino como documento, como historia. Contado a través de un dilema desenterrado por una carta de Margot Wellington a Gordon Matta-Clark, se presenta la relación entre el archivo, la arquitectura y las artes. En este sentido, se pone en duda la temporalidad de la arquitectura, ya que su historia puede ser reproducida y recreada a través de los documentos y páginas que se encuentran en el archivo, lo cual deja la pregunta abierta de qué fue primero, el edificio o el documento.

Palabras clave: arquitectura, arte, archivo, ficción, realidad, registros, documentos, Gordon Matta-Clark

Margot’s Dilemma: Exit Through the Back Door

Tania Tovar Torres

Abstract

What happens when a building ceases to exist? What happens when the reality of an edifice or a work of art becomes subject to reconstruction? This essay makes the argument that architecture can continue surviving not as an object –a building– but rather as a document, a story. Told through the dilemma uncovered in a letter from Margot Wellington to Gordon Matta-Clark, this essay examines the relationship between the archive, architecture and the arts. In this sense, the temporality of architecture is put into question, for its history can be reproduced and recreated through the documents and papers held in the archive, making us wonder: which came first, the building or the document?

Keywords: architecture, art, archive, fiction, reality, records, documents, Gordon Matta-Clark

45 ARCHIVOS DE ARQUITECTURAAutores
EditorialCristina López Uribe
I N V E S T I G A C I Ó N 
The Role of Archives in the Graphic Restitution of Monuments: The Case of the Roman Bridge over the Ofanto River near Canosa di Puglia, ItalyGermano Germanò
Notes from an Archiving Project: Building the Private Archive of an Architect in TurkeySelda Bancı
El archivo como obra total. Amancio Williams y la construcción de su memoriaLuis Müller
¿Hacia una dispersión de archivos arquitectónicos?Sergio M. Figuereido
Cuidar en el archivo de arquitectura: una subversión matrísticaLuz Marie Rodríguez López
El legado de George y Geraldine Andrews para México en los Alexander Architectural Archives de AustinLaura Gilabert Sansalvador
Mónica Cejudo Collera
El archivo y la biblioteca: una provocación para otra historia de la arquitectura del siglo XIXM. Fernanda Barrera Rubio Hernández
Archival Impression: (Re)Collecting Gordon Matta-ClarkMarcelo López-Dinardi
E N S A Y O 
Margot's Dilemma: Exit Through the Back DoorTania Tovar Torres
El archivo jovenGuadalupe E. Luna Rodríguez
Patrimonio documental: memoria y futuro del Archivo de Arquitectos MexicanosLourdes Cruz González Franco
Elisa Drago Quaglia
María Eugenia Hernández Sánchez
Le Centre d’archives d’architecture du XXe siècle de la Cité de l’architecture et du patrimoine. Entrevista a David Peyceré Director del Centre d’archives d’architecture du XXe siècleAndrés Ávila Gómez
R E S E Ñ A S 
En torno a la exposición L'art du chantier. Construire et démolir du XVIe au XXIe siècleAndrés Ávila Gómez
Reseña de la exposición: Unterm RadarMichael Andrés Forrero Parra
Reseñas de librosCamilo Alejandro Moreno Iregui
Pamela Caparroso Gutiérrez
Lilián Martínez Villazón Robledo
  
  

The New York Times, February 18, 1975. The image shows a wall cut open with a hole, carefully made so as not to damage the structure of the building. This photograph could have been of any work by Gordon Matta-Clark if it hadn’t been for the following caption: “Kung Sang Ho standing outside hole through which burglars entered to rob his store at 177 Canal Street in Chinatown. He said thieves must have known watchman’s schedule.” 4503N01 Burglars, making the right cut somewhere between the supports and collapse4503N02 laborious but unexpected, passed undetected, but not without leaving something behind. A story to be told by a circle-shaped hole in the corner of a wall. That same day, Ms. Margot Wellington, vice president of the Downtown Brooklyn Development Association, sent a letter to Mr. Matta-Clark. Attached was a clipping of this article. The letter read: 4503N03

Dear Gordon,
It is said that life imitates art.
Right after you left my office,
I read and felt I must send
it to you.
Sincerely,
Margot

Margot’s letter reveals a deeper dilemma. Does life truly imitate art? Do our own constructs now dictate what we thought came first? And if so, which came first? Art or reality?

Newspaper clipping from The New York Times included with a letter from Margot Wellington to Gordon Matta-Clark, February 18, 1975, newsprint, 19.0 x 13.1 cm (irregular). PHCON2002:0016:003:048.2, Canadian Centre for Architecture, Gift of Estate of Gordon Matta-Clark © The New York Times

When Office Baroque, the last remaining building-intervention by Matta-Clark, was demolished, many felt that his contributions to art had been forever lost. It wasn’t until later that the documentary material he left behind made it to the public, that the letters, notebooks, drawings, negatives and newspaper clippings ultimately replaced the works themselves. Long after both he and his pieces were gone, the previously private life of the artist/architect took over. 4503N04 The many documents derived from his cut-up walls are the tools that allow these ideas to prevail over time, regardless of their physical lifespan. 4503N05

The archive not only mediates its relationship to the world by designating new representations, but also by producing an eidetic, a relationship to the world that represents these processes as documents. 4503N06

Gordon Matta-Clark Art Card (Making the right…), 1970-1978, black felt-tip pen, 10.2 x 15.2 cm. PHCON2002:0016:001:030.7, Canadian Centre for Architecture, Gift of Estate of Gordon Matta-Clark
© Estate of Gordon Matta-Clark

This documentation thus serves as a double, making up for what is absent. As the collapse of the wall approaches and its materiality disappears, the archive replaces its existence. The partially-collapsed wall in the news photograph, supported by the documentation of the text, prevented the hole from becoming nothingness, oblivion. Margot’s interpretation turned it into memory. The price that the wall and the hole had to pay to prevail is connected not only to their materiality, but also to their reinterpretation. Documentation makes for the life of the archive and this makes the piece more complex and less rigid, less material and more abstract, more related to perception than in its original meaning; media becomes an inherent part of the experience, not only to the public, but also to the authors themselves. 4503N07

The story of the 1929 Barcelona International Exhibition’s German Pavilion is beautifully entangled in Margot’s dilemma. 4503N08 A pavilion that almost nobody had seen prior to its demolition was rewritten into something that has now become a universal reference for Mies van der Rohe’s work. 4503N09 The image constructed through the many articles written about it, and in Margot’s (or rather Oscar Wilde’s) 4503N10 terms —art— built not only a text, but a second pavilion —life— based on the image contained in its documentary descriptions. Today, photographs of the second pavilion are considered by many to be authentic. A few surviving photos of the first pavilion, and a few well-written words, have turned the reproduction into an icon of modernity. 4503N11

Letter from Margot Wellington to Gordon Matta-Clark, February 18, 1975, typescript and ink on paper, 9.8 x 13.7 cm.
PHCON2002:0016:003:048.1, Canadian Centre for Architecture, Gift of Estate of Gordon Matta-Clark

Life imitates art, making a built reality out of the document. The unintended reproduction of the hole becomes meaningful when it reminds someone of Matta-Clark’s work. This provides the object with values, allowing it to prevail over time, but it is also capable of generating values on its own. Foucault explains the inversion of physical existence vis-à-vis the existence of the document or the archive 4503N12 where the relationship in which the document followed history is reversed and the document is now able to create. Like the German Pavilion, Splitting, Conical Intersect, Caribbean Orange and Office Baroque are all vindicated through their reinterpretation. The multiple interpretations made by Margot, or by anyone else, determine reality – or more precisely, new realities in which art pieces can even serve as the inspiration to a burglary. Out of all the stories in the Matta-Clark archive, this letter, the connections made by Ms. Wellington, the burglars cutting through the wall, this essay and the many speculations the reader can engage in based on a short sentence, some photos and a caption are just some of the possible materializations and now-truthful variations on Matta-Clark’s work.

The wall, as a material object, ceases to be a reference or a witness to an art piece, while documents become entities that are free to create, giving rise to something stranger than fiction: 4503N13 documents rebuilding an object that has become expendable, turning the art piece into an idea and the letter, history. As carefully-curated images and letters, well-written essays and properly stored photographs reinterpret the world, reality will slowly exit through the same hole through which all those speculative images came in. However, Gordon Matta-Clark will remain in every man-made hole in a wall, in the photos contained in a folder, in the correspondence stored in a box or simply the exit through the back door of a store at 177 Canal Street in Chinatown.

 

 

Tania Tovar Torres

Cofounder and Director of Proyector

B. Arch., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

MS in Critical, Curatorial and Conceptual Practices in Architecture,

Columbia Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation

ttovar@proyectormx.org

FB / IG / TW @taniushkatt

www.proyectormx.org

 

acerca de  |  inicio  |  archivo  |  convocatoria

Bitácora Arquitectura Número 43, julio - noviembre 2019 es una publicación cuatrimestral, editada por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, Ciudad de México,
a través de la Coordinación editorial de la Facultad de Arquitectura, Circuito Escolar s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, C.P. 04510, teléfono: 56 22 03 18.

El contenido de los artículos es totalmente responsabilidad de sus autores y no refleja necesariamente el punto de vista del Comité editorial o de la Facultad de Arquitectura de la UNAM. Se autoriza la reproducción de los artículos
(no así de las imágenes) con la condición de que se cite la fuente y se respeten los derechos de autor. Para suscripción y distribución de ejemplares impresos: bitacoraunam@gmail.com / bitacora.arquitectura@unam.mx

Hemos puesto todo nuestro empeño en contactar a aquellas personas que poseen los derechos de autor de las imágenes publicadas en la revista. En algunos casos no nos ha sido posible, y por esta razón sugerimos a los propietarios
de tales derechos que se pongan en contacto con la redacción de esta revista.

Fecha de la última modificación: 21 de Septiembre de 2020.

Bitácora Arquitectura No. 43, July - November 2019 publishes three times a year. Edited by the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, Mexico City. Publications Department of the School of Architecture (Facultad de Arquitectura), Circuito Interior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, Mexico City, +52(55) 56220318.

The content of the articles is entirely the responsibility of its authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editorial Board or the School of Architecture of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Reproduction of the articles is authorized provided that the source is cited and copyright is respected. This does not apply to images. Subscriptions (printed issues):to bitacoraunam@gmail.com and bitacora.arquitectura@unam.mx

We have done our best effort to find the copyright's owners of the images published in this issue. In some cases this was not possible, therefore we kindly ask them to contact the journal.

Last modification: September 21, 2020

45 ARCHIVOS DE ARQUITECTURAAutores
EditorialCristina López Uribe
I N V E S T I G A C I Ó N 
The Role of Archives in the Graphic Restitution of Monuments: The Case of the Roman Bridge over the Ofanto River near Canosa di Puglia, ItalyGermano Germanò
Notes from an Archiving Project: Building the Private Archive of an Architect in TurkeySelda Bancı
El archivo como obra total. Amancio Williams y la construcción de su memoriaLuis Müller
¿Hacia una dispersión de archivos arquitectónicos?Sergio M. Figuereido
Cuidar en el archivo de arquitectura: una subversión matrísticaLuz Marie Rodríguez López
El legado de George y Geraldine Andrews para México en los Alexander Architectural Archives de AustinLaura Gilabert Sansalvador
Mónica Cejudo Collera
El archivo y la biblioteca: una provocación para otra historia de la arquitectura del siglo XIXM. Fernanda Barrera Rubio Hernández
Archival Impression: (Re)Collecting Gordon Matta-ClarkMarcelo López-Dinardi
E N S A Y O 
Margot's Dilemma: Exit Through the Back DoorTania Tovar Torres
El archivo jovenGuadalupe E. Luna Rodríguez
Patrimonio documental: memoria y futuro del Archivo de Arquitectos MexicanosLourdes Cruz González Franco
Elisa Drago Quaglia
María Eugenia Hernández Sánchez
Le Centre d’archives d’architecture du XXe siècle de la Cité de l’architecture et du patrimoine. Entrevista a David Peyceré Director del Centre d’archives d’architecture du XXe siècleAndrés Ávila Gómez
R E S E Ñ A S 
En torno a la exposición L'art du chantier. Construire et démolir du XVIe au XXIe siècleAndrés Ávila Gómez
Reseña de la exposición: Unterm RadarMichael Andrés Forrero Parra
Reseñas de librosCamilo Alejandro Moreno Iregui
Pamela Caparroso Gutiérrez
Lilián Martínez Villazón Robledo
  
  
Share This

Compartir

Comparte este artículo